|
Post by fastwalker on Apr 4, 2005 21:17:55 GMT -5
Ga2ry Needtoknow New Member member is offline Posts: 3 Re: From John Martin about this new Lawyer « Reply #2 on: Apr 2nd, 2005, 5:05pm » <br> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ IMO--- I never heard of any company asking shareholders to put up any money ever...... This has to be a dumb and stupid scam asking for money lol--in fact its hurts the credibility of this company to even imply such an action...starting to raise doubts now if any of this is credible ----judgement day will come to those who are if they are fleecing us--if good lord willing.. ___________________________________________ Its a private investor and his attorney asking...not the company....fw
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Apr 4, 2005 21:18:41 GMT -5
goldilocks New Member
member is offline
Gender: Posts: 4 Re: From John Martin about this new Lawyer « Reply #4 on: Apr 2nd, 2005, 7:47pm » <br> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have been lurking on this board for a year now, but I can't hold back any longer, it appearers to me that this lawyer has been hired to watch' UC, 'not the SEC or to protect the Shareholders, protect the shareholders from whom and what,' UC' holds the Mineral rights on possibly the largest field of it's kind in the world, He's a good old boy and we are familiar with that, here in Texas, Does this Attorney require a retainer fee, to file against' UC ' ? the problem with that, there is no financial earning or holdings, UC owns nothing in his name, just Mineral rights, will this attorney settle for the per-centage of mineral rights, they may not be in his name either. so who comes out on top ? the attorney at $25. per head thats over a million $$$$ so once again everyone makes monies but CMKX, To pay and send a Trial Attorney to the SEC hearing one which he may not even get into is pure bulls$$$, always has been and always will be. He might be just gunning for UC.
more...
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Apr 4, 2005 21:20:39 GMT -5
hexges Global Moderator member is offline Posts: 326 Re: From John Martin about this new Lawyer « Reply #5 on: Apr 2nd, 2005, 10:51pm » <br> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ well this lawyer has not even been allowed by the courts- so he may not even get through the doors - he will be sitting in the back collecting everyones money - he probably wouldn't even say a word and not refund peoples money - yes its a good idea but the sec is actually there for the shareholders because its cmkx that has to prove their worth and credibility to the world..... cmkx been hiding a lot - we can't find a lot of fact and proof what the company actually has.... everyone slandering the sec when they are the organization trying to make the market work smoothy for investors... the sec may not have a lot of enforcement but cmkx has not shown to the shareholders anything worth what they say .... the sec is for better protection against cmkx trying to cover up and hold back the real story not the crap pumpers sprout out there think about it - people bashing the sec for trying to better the market and make sure your investment is not fraudulent...... sure lets just kill the market - then you got useless fracking shares in your account that is meaningless and they is what the sec is trying to prevent................................ so if this person wants the lawyer then he should front the money for himself because he will get a percentage from the lawyers probably while the rest get squat --- really what will the shareholders get out from this guy... its not like its a cash settlement case and he doesn't follow everyones veiws.... he jumping on the cmkx band wagon just to try claim to fame... give me a break because the sec is hopefully going make sure cmkx is real or we find out the uc is a moron scammer that pulled the wool over all of us ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Fast walker, Your right channeling this will help control proliferation, confusion. todd my real name is rob. You guys have a wealth of info and minimal bs unlike other boards rob
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Apr 4, 2005 21:21:19 GMT -5
All Now I am hoping CMKX comes forward with a filling before this April 25th dead line. This will make this Lawyer situation go away. There will be no need for it. Garry Interesting thread...!
|
|