|
Post by Cancri on Feb 28, 2005 13:05:05 GMT -5
UC will not give up his money maker. That is the point I was trying to make why this company will never turn around. As long as he maintains his strong hold we (as investors) will never benefit. It is in his nature to be sneaky, crooked, and under-handed, and he would rather milk this thing dry before putting in some real work to make the business work. He is so focused on how he can squeeze money from others, his own company, and on how he can get his next big gambling fix. Did you all see the Feb, 8 news release about Michael Williams (recording industry background) joining the board of directors. This is another poor soul that got sucked into UC for probably $1M or more with the promise of a seat on the board with millions-billions of shares. What is a recording industry executive doing on the board of a mining company. What real value can he bring. This is the crazy sh_t I am talking about. He is really going into some dangerous territory bringing in people in the rap industry. You think they are going to take a $1M loss. Time will tell .....
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 13:26:42 GMT -5
UC will not give up his money maker. That is the point I was trying to make why this company will never turn around. As long as he maintains his strong hold we (as investors) will never benefit. It is in his nature to be sneaky, crooked, and under-handed, and he would rather milk this thing dry before putting in some real work to make the business work. He is so focused on how he can squeeze money from others, his own company, and on how he can get his next big gambling fix. Did you all see the Feb, 8 news release about Michael Williams (recording industry background) joining the board of directors. This is another poor soul that got sucked into UC for probably $1M or more with the promise of a seat on the board with millions-billions of shares. What is a recording industry executive doing on the board of a mining company. What real value can he bring. This is the crazy sh_t I am talking about. He is really going into some dangerous territory bringing in people in the rap industry. You think they are going to take a $1M loss. Time will tell ..... Cancri..thank you for sharing your thoughts. I would like to now to take the time to read this... newcmkx.proboards33.com/index.cgi?board=DD&action=display&thread=1109610323and provide the board members here, with your discoverd "facts" to substantiate your claims relevent to UC, williams and other aspects of your posts.. Thanks...we all want thses "facts" presented to ensure our unbaised view of the stock... and I'm sure, you do not want to be seen as simply a basher.. who will be banned not for saying negative things, but for not backing up or supplying facts to back up your statements being presented for the edification of others to review.. take care...
|
|
|
Post by ToddCT on Feb 28, 2005 13:29:51 GMT -5
UC will not give up his money maker. That is the point I was trying to make why this company will never turn around. As long as he maintains his strong hold we (as investors) will never benefit. It is in his nature to be sneaky, crooked, and under-handed, and he would rather milk this thing dry before putting in some real work to make the business work. He is so focused on how he can squeeze money from others, his own company, and on how he can get his next big gambling fix. Did you all see the Feb, 8 news release about Michael Williams (recording industry background) joining the board of directors. This is another poor soul that got sucked into UC for probably $1M or more with the promise of a seat on the board with millions-billions of shares. What is a recording industry executive doing on the board of a mining company. What real value can he bring. This is the crazy sh_t I am talking about. He is really going into some dangerous territory bringing in people in the rap industry. You think they are going to take a $1M loss. Time will tell ..... I have said a very similar thing before as well. I don't trust UC one bit, and he will milk the company for as many millions as he can take from it, without much regard for the shareholders. BUT................. The momentum from the investors who will buy the stock and the short covering should make us all a ton of money if we are patient enough and let it play out. I don't trust ANY (NOT EVEN ONE) CEO of a pink sheet company, really why the hell would the company be only a pinky if it was totally legit. They ar epinky so that they can manipulate the stock to their advantage. That is why it is risky, but as we always say, the risk matches the rewards. Think about this, the great stock picker Peter Lynch has NEVER, not even once had what he calls a "ten-bagger" a 1000% return, we already had a 1100% return on this stock, whether you sold or not is your fault. JMHO,
|
|
|
Post by ToddCT on Feb 28, 2005 13:31:53 GMT -5
Cancri..thank you for sharing your thoughts. I would like to now to take the time to read this... newcmkx.proboards33.com/index.cgi?board=DD&action=display&thread=1109610323and provide the board members here, with your discoverd "facts" to substantiate your claims relevent to UC, williams and other aspects of your posts.. Thanks...we all want thses "facts" presented to ensure our unbaised view of the stock... and I'm sure, you do not want to be seen as simply a basher.. who will be banned not for saying negative things, but for not backing up or supplying facts to back up your statements being presented for the edification of others to review.. take care... FW, I am not agreeing with Cancri 100%, but honestly how can you ask him to substantiate somthing that noone can prove right or wrong yet....... that is not entirely fair. T
|
|
|
Post by bridgeburner on Feb 28, 2005 18:18:14 GMT -5
To label a man as a low down skunk as she has we need proof of Sneaky,Crooked,and Underhanded things that he has done.Please supply this info. at your convenince
|
|