Just the facts ma'am! Mar 7, 2005 10:17:01 GMT -5
Post by fastwalker on Mar 7, 2005 10:17:01 GMT -5
fastwalker said:Point #1 (hereafter all points will be referred to as simply their numerical assigned identifier).
This is a straight forward statement clearly indicating a specific intent on the part of the SEC to impose it's will upon CMKX.
#2. This statement indicates that the SEC has at least
six (6) "stated" areas of concerns arising from
CMKX's failure to imitate, comply and file forms in
accordance with SEC stated "mandatory" rules /
#3. This statement clearly indicates that CMKX was
involved with the SEC at some level, to accommodate
the requirements necessary to satisfy the SEC
stated "mandatory" rules / regulations.
It also indicates that the SEC is requiring additional
information relevant to "another" entity, which
CMKX had prior dealings with in 2002.
#4. This statement clearly indicates that as a result of
this "inquiry" imitated by the SEC with regards to
this "other entity," the association between CMKX
is or was current, involves stock transactions and in
was initiated in 2002 and may culminates at some
point here, in the present.
#5. This stock transaction was of a nature that
caused the SEC concern, that its process may
have been so blatant or "inconsistent" with the
stated "mandatory" rules / regulations, that the
transaction could be views as a "conflict."
#6. Formal request would indicate that the interaction
taking place currently between CMKX - SEC is still in
a non-formal..maybe friendly stage? But, due to the
nature of the "pause," more "hard copy" data may
be required to support /defend /deny.
#7. This statement is clear.CMKX was working with the
and for whatever reason, the SEC decided
to "elevate" the inquiry to the next level, to "force"
#8. same as a#7. sounds though like surprise, anger,
and confusion on the part of CMKX..especially if
they are in fact "working" with the SEC to resolve
#9. The alleged "intention" behind the SEC's pause of
#10. This appears to sound like CMKX knew they had a
problem and specifically engaged Mr. Maheu to
work on and through the "particulars" to a
satisfactory conclusion. If the rumors of Mr. Maheu
being at the Vegas party are true, then it would
appear that he has been in UC's confidence for