|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 0:05:01 GMT -5
Has anyone noticed on the far right side of the map under the company directory you have CMKX and at the bottom of the companies listed there is a gray block listed as "OTHER"...... There is alot of land listed in gray that we somewhat know nothing about. I have no problem with not knowing but it sure seems like alot of land. Did you get these yet? By: buzzard120 27 Feb 2005, 05:39 PM EST Msg. 163486 of 163590 Jump to msg. # My son tells me...... the guy FAR left is our new board member (see pic smith/barney guys). Anyone confirm this? Regards, buzz casavantmining.com/locations.aspmembers.cox.net/mikebrandt/firebird.htm
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 0:05:51 GMT -5
I was just comparing the CMKX claims on the "Project Surround" map passed out at the party late last year with the new Phoenix version provided by Tradetracker on IHUB at: www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=5570807Certain areas that used to be gray (signifying "others") or white (unclaimed) on the old map now show up as large new CMKX blocks North of Candle lake, East of Candle lake, at the extreme East of De Beers, and Southwest of De Beers. Sorry I don't have a link to the old map, but if you can dig one up either electronically or as a hardcopy from the party like I did it's really worth a look. The amount of new CMKX claims added in only a few months is quite striking!
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 0:09:41 GMT -5
New Dr. Audio from Feb 25...I haven't listened to it yet... 24.71.61.132/CMKXMP3/ Skip the first 10 minutes... someone had trouble wiring money. My favorite part starts at 33:43 for about 1 minute. -------------------- Dr. Diamond: I think at one point and you know this has been a few months ago and the information was shared in confidence and this had been three or four months ago but from what I understand, it's old news now. There was a time where they had drilled 40 holes and the information that I had received was that 38 of those 40 holes were diamondiferous. Now whatever that means, it simply means that they had drilled 40 holes and 38 had hit diamonds. Now it did not say how many, how huge, if they were macro/micro or whatever. So you know, I don't know. But I would think that, you know, that is something we should be, should have probably went to the lab. They should be getting some lab results back on that stuff. Now that's been a long time ago. Anycase, that's just rumor until it's been confirmed by the company
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 0:11:17 GMT -5
here are some highlights, I hope they make sense(cents soon?). 1. Should see edgar filings really quickly, the 60 day thing is not relevant as the filings are now due immediately! 2. United Carina is responsible for the Carolyn situation. 3. Thinks the NSS is very severe, not sure how it will be handled. 4. Thinks IBM make CMKX a reporting company quickly with his pull. MM's not expecting that!! 5. Last he heard about the GEMM divies is that they were about to be distributed. 1st Global had picked them up themselves. Thinks 2nd divie will be separate. 6. Doesn't think there will be any change in any of divies as already delivered. 7. Can't forsee any problems with CMKX in the future after filing. 8. Knew USCA would be hammered. VERY important that they file. Definitely was organized effort to pull USCA down. 9. He owns a significant amount in certs., its a gaurantee that you own part of the company. Do your DD and decide for yourself. 10. Brokerage firms WILL cover your shares one way or another. 11. Reccomends certs for LONGs. 12. Lots of movement on CMKX property. 13. Main priority for CMKX is reporting and protecting co. from delisting. 14. Thinks RG trapped mm's in Oct. 15. THEORY ONLY-Possible to raise A/S to include the short shares, make mm's pay for the trouble, and use that money for a cash divi. Then 2-4to1 r/s to bring O/S back down. This would take care of nss issue. 16. any R/S would benefit the mm's - so more than likely not!! Thats all I had time for. Hope this helps out. There is more, but I think this got the main points. I just want to fish the rest of my life with friends and family and while on the water, wonder what all the poor folk are doing today!!!! GLTA!!! Fishin
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 9:01:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 9:02:36 GMT -5
Here’s a rumor to start your heart pumping….Interesting: Could be CMKX related and why we haven't purchased drill rigs, CMKX may be contracting out to Major Drilling Corporation: Major Drilling just purchased about 30 drill rigs for North America. The link. biz.yahoo.com/cnw/050227/major_drilling_1.html
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 9:03:02 GMT -5
This will be a worthwhile post….Everyone, after Tuesday, I will get a lot of info from my financial adviser on which way to invest my money now, and when this stock hits... He understands about a Dynasty Trust, and will give me all the facts, including some other ways to spread it around, and pay the least amount of taxes... As soon as I get that info I will try and pull together a post to explain... It was kind of funny, after he looked at the stock he called me back, and wanted to know more about this stock, and said it was one of the best situations he's every seen, and was asking me a lot of question about it.. So who knows I may have just sold some more of (CMKX)... LOL GLTA Best Regards... Jabber
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 9:03:22 GMT -5
*Citigroup shows their interest in the diamond....... industry via the article below: www.diamonds.net/news/newsitem.asp?num=10409&type=all&topic=all&searchfor=citigroup&author= If Citigroup can show huge financial support for a diamond related company such as ZAO Alrosa, why not show interest in Urban Casavant who sits on many acres of diamond rich properties/claims. This support has already been displayed on Urban's racing car. God Bless to all! Peter (Dxild
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 9:03:44 GMT -5
A quote …very applicable to CMKX….”Wall street is the transfer of wealth from the impatient to the patient" ………Warren Buffett
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 9:04:14 GMT -5
It’s the law….lol….. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 12(g) 1. Every issuer. issuer which is engaged in interstate commerce, or in a business affecting interstate commerce, or whose securities are traded by use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce shall-- a. within one hundred and twenty days after the last day of its first fiscal year ended after July 1, 1964, on which the issuer has total assets exceeding $1,000,000 and a class of equity security (other than an exempted security) held of record by seven hundred and fifty or more persons; and b. within one hundred and twenty days after the last day of its first fiscal year ended after two years from July 1, 1964, on which the issuer has total assets exceeding $1,000,000 and a class of equity security (other than an exempted security) held of record by five hundred or more but less than seven hundred and fifty persons, register such security by filing with the Commission a registration statement (and such copies thereof as the Commission may require) with respect to such security containing such information and documents as the Commission may specify comparable to that which is required in an application to register a security pursuant to subsection (b) of this section. Each such registration statement shall become effective sixty days after filing with the Commission or within such shorter period as the Commission may direct. Until such registration statement becomes effective it shall not be deemed filed for the purposes of section 18. Any issuer may register any class of equity security not required to be registered by filing a registration statement pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph. The Commission is authorized to extend the date upon which any issuer or class of issuers is required to register a security pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph. Summary... If you answer YES to the following questions... you have to file within 120 days of the year you did so... 1. Interstate commerce? YES 2. Traded by any means? YES 3. Over $1,000,000 in assets? YES 4. Held by more than 750 persons? YES Furthermore...lol "Each such registration statement shall become effective sixty days after filing with the Commission or within such shorter period as the Commission may direct. Until such registration statement becomes effective it shall not be deemed filed for the purposes of section 18." Included above.... They only have 60 days. As the SEC has up to 60 days to make the filing effective and it is not considered filed until the SEC calls it effective....blah blah blah.... 120-60=60. CMKX must file by ... March 1st, 2005 They unregistered in July 2003 claiming around 300 shareholders and never claimed having more than 344 dollars until 2004. Will know tomorrow George…..fw
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 9:04:54 GMT -5
Here is another slant……same topic… By: KidWallStreet 13 Jan 2005, 03:10 AM EST Msg. 755349 of 755352 Jump to msg. # $$$$$$CMKX FILING DEADLINE***** The message boards have been buzzing in anticipation of the long awaited filing by CMKM Diamonds in order to become "fully reporting". Unfortunately, much of the information that has been posted about how and when that filing must happen is inaccurate. On 7/22/03, CMKM filed a Form 15-12g with the SEC requesting that they be exempted from making all future filings. www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1092299/000111776803000061/casafif.htm SEC Rule 12g-4 -- Certifications of Termination of Registration, section (a) 1(i) was used as a basis for the exemption: 1. Such class of securities is held of record by: i. Less than 300 persons; www.law.uc.edu/CCL/34ActRls/rule12g-4.html I will grant that on 01/01/04, that basis might very well have still been true. However, by 01/01/05, the number of CMKX shareholders was conservatively estimated to be in then range of 50,000. The basis for the filing exemption was no longer valid. What are the implications of that fact? CMKM Diamonds must file a Form 10-K (or in their case a 10-KSB) for the entire preceding year. Not a 10QSB as has been so widely posted. The filing required of CMKM is a full annual report for the year 2004. They have 120 days from 12/31/04 to make that filing. SEC Rule 12h-3 Suspension of Duty to File Reports under Section 15(d) e. If the suspension provided by this rule is discontinued because a class of securities does not meet the eligibility criteria of paragraph (b) on the first day of an issuer's fiscal year, then the issuer shall resume periodic reporting pursuant to Section 15(d) by filing an annual report on Form 10-K and Form 10-KSB for its preceding fiscal year, not later than 120 days after the end of such fiscal year. www.law.uc.edu/CCL/34ActRls/rule12h-3.html
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 9:05:26 GMT -5
A couple of additional points; the filing must be submitted electronically via EDGAR not "FedEx'd" on paper as has been erroneously reported. Also, the SEC does not evaluate filings before they are made public although respected posters have made both points (incorrectly). Here is a link to an earlier "discussion" on how filing is accomplished with links to the EGDAR rules if anyone is interested in revisiting that topic. www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4251912 So, start your CMKX filing countdown clocks...The deadline is 05/01/05 @ 11:59:59 PM. ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=755349Dear people who don't get it, this was written way before CMKM filed the amendment to their form 15 and hold no weight anymore. The 60 days from the Form 15 amendment is what we wait for now... and the regular due date for the 10K for 2004. -burns Next quarterly due by March 31st and should be timely, so I'm thinking they would want all previous quarterlies and yearly to be done before that date. We shall see! No reason to file sequentially at all. Filing the old reports does not require amendments... there is nothing to amend. Filing the most recent report first would put their best foot forward... some of the other filings aren't going to be so pretty. No reason either way to file in order or out of order.
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 22:13:18 GMT -5
***New Paltalk Rumor*** « Thread started on: Today at 9:59pm » <br> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take this with a huge grain of salt I don't know any of these people who I am about to post to you: cmkxforme: well theres a guy called the smoker in the other room - did you hear what he said any1? cmkxforme: he said his wife cmkxforme: called the transfer agent and cmkxforme: they told him filing tomorrow and they will be releasing the o/s on wed cmkxforme: actually he said they told him o/s to be released wed so cmkxforme: he said filing must be tomorrow cuz it has to be out before o/s can be released cmkxforme: ya i dunno-just wanted to tell yas
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 22:43:08 GMT -5
Just for info purposes. Concerning R/S comments.. Andy Hill is a professional that works for the company and will not release any information of this type, good or bad. He can only talk about the information that has been released and is already public knowledge. I hope shareholders can understand that. He can only speak about information that has already been officially released by the company either through a PR or an official filing. He can't read between the lines of the filing or project based upon a PR or filing, only discuss the actual info that is released. 2. More than likely Andy doesn't know if an R/S is in the picture. This info would not be discussed in his presence. JMHO. 3. Per conversation with Mr. Andy Hill, he did not say or write anything about an R/S one way or the other. The info has been sent to our legal department. We are a reporting company under the SEC and now we are trying to become compliant. The SEC attorneys will be guided by the rules and regs as they know them. Stay with offical Pr's and legal filings. Investors need to stop mucking around with other shareholders emotions. If anyone knows BHP on IHUB tell him to be careful. This type of information being released will not be tolerated. 4. IMHO CMKX knows an R/S at this point would be senseless as it would only benefit the naked short position. If the NSS position is 500 billion and if an R/S of say 5:1 occurred then the NSS position would be reduced to 100 billion. The PPS would be multiplied by 5 moving it from .0002 to .0010 but the MM would immediately drive it back down to .0001 & .0002. An R/S is not in the plan IMHO. I have to run, just wanted to comment. These are just my opinions and I ask that you treat them as such. Thanks. Success is at hand. Dr.D
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Feb 28, 2005 22:43:51 GMT -5
This is the post Dr. D is referring to: www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=5576819Confirmed: Andy Hill says no Reverse Split. Read on... Andy says the company will not reverse split. Has never been on the mind of Urban. Will kill the future plan of what is being developed. Possibly a consolidation down the line but far from it. Look for this to move soon. With a capital "S"
|
|