|
Post by fastwalker on Mar 1, 2005 9:14:18 GMT -5
www.noboxtrading.com/cmkm.htmMANY MAPS--That are 'clickable' and interactive: We feel CMKX is the most discounted stock available for purchase, ever. It is currently trading between .0002 and .0001. Two hundred US dollars can pick up one million shares at current prices. This was selected as an unboxed stock due to the risk to reward imbalance. A low initial investment could potentially turn into thousands of dollars. This, the same as all unboxed stocks, is guaranteed to go one of four ways. (up, down, sideways, or halted)
|
|
|
Post by Bart on Mar 1, 2005 11:13:18 GMT -5
;D ;D
FW: Very good work. IMO things could really be planned out for our little pinky. One thing that people I feel are forgetting about. Is yes we may still have only one drill rig for CMKX. But, UC said we were hiring a professional drilling group to help with the drilling. He said they had all their own very modern equipment. Also, our JV's might just be doing something. I find it hard to think that they would just be setting there.
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Mar 1, 2005 12:50:00 GMT -5
I agree Bart...UC should forget drilling as CMKX exporation...lol, do like all the others do...surround yourself with those who have the expertise...which is what I have said and believed all along that UC was and should be doing...lol
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Mar 1, 2005 12:51:32 GMT -5
By: get-r-dun 01 Mar 2005, 09:35 AM EST Msg. 164148 of 164225 Jump to msg. # CMKX mentioned on CNBC? Was just talking to a co-worker who claims he was watching CNBC this morning at 3am central time and he said that some guy mentioned CMKX as a company to watch. Did anyone else hear this? If true, it is a shame that it was at 3am....eom CMKX OS to come out today (via PR/filing) or tomorrow .. confirmed by GreenBaron (in Paltalk) and TA. This should be a very exciting week for CMKX. REALLY?........FW CMKX:The speculation is that 1st global will released O/S sometime this week Apparently SMKR wife called and spoke to agent Mitchell. She was told that there are just waiting on the company to give the go ahead to do it. As usual, take it with a grain of salt. cmkx: I just now called the TA and talked to Helen and I quote. She said talked to attorney office, they will release O/S this week and she said they plan on putting out a pr showing o/s and they meaning the lawyers. This is what she just said to me. Maybe finally we will be hearing something, good or bad, bring it on!!!!!!!!!!!! ….MACH1COBRA
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Mar 1, 2005 12:51:53 GMT -5
It was way to funny! As soon as I said that I wanted to follow-up on a rumor, she said " CMKX" before I could finish.. She stated that it was confirmed by the Lawyers for CMKX that yes, there will be a PR this week with the O/S. I tried my best to get her to reveal the O/S but she wouldln't bite..But we did have fun with it to say the least. I tried...I started at 800B and kept moving down from there, she wouldn't bite. but it was fun She ask that I tell as many people as I can so she can eat lunch later. s/32
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Mar 1, 2005 12:52:17 GMT -5
CMKX - Anyone else seeing TJAS on the ask @ .01? He's there on my eSignal LII….. L2: (14).0001 x (15).0002..s/32
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Mar 1, 2005 12:52:36 GMT -5
Looks like Carquest might be right again! He said that PR's are lined up just like airplanes on the runway! I agree or tomorrow at the latest IMO. Have a good day all eom.
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Mar 1, 2005 12:52:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Mar 1, 2005 12:53:17 GMT -5
Around 10 this morning Melvin was on paltalk FYI ...said it is now common knowlege..it can be read in newspapers..in Fort La Corne are..townspeople ar talking about it.It's NO SECRET. Apparently MANY surrounding towns in the FLC area are pooling big $$$ together in order to build good roads into the area...(I presume making their buisnesses easily accesable)AS there is SOOO much activity and it GROWING quickly. Radio
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Mar 1, 2005 12:54:06 GMT -5
my 2 cents = the MM's have known what's goin on here for MONTHS!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Mar 1, 2005 12:54:18 GMT -5
My definition of PR=news of any kind brought to the shareholders that isn't already known=PR=FILING ETC
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Mar 1, 2005 12:54:57 GMT -5
If we get the O/S....then maybe we can get the 2nd GEMM dividend too. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Mar 2, 2005 9:43:06 GMT -5
Web Posted: 03/02/2005 12:00 AM CST
San Antonio Express-News Naked short selling sounds like something yucky. Visualize unclothed traders selling stocks short. If only it were that harmless. Unfortunately, that's not what naked short selling is. To the extent it occurs, naked short selling is a damaging, illegal form of selling stocks short. The practice is harmful to the financial process that allows startup businesses to go public and flourish, thus hindering the creation of wealth for entrepreneurs and investors alike. Short selling itself is legitimate and has always existed. It is when traders and investors borrow stock, betting that the price will fall, making a profit from the difference. This is a natural practice that helps the market correctly price securities. Naked short selling is different. The traders in this case do not borrow the shares they are shorting, using the allowed time lag before having to deliver certified shares. In effect, they are selling counterfeited shares in an effort to drive down the price of a stock. They often do this through hedge funds, sometimes based offshore. "It's like a company that has 1 million shares, but there are 2 million shares out there being sold. It puts selling pressure on the stock and becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy," explained Jordan Goodman, author of "Everyone's Money Book." Think of airlines that oversell seats on a flight. Naked short sellers are doing the same thing — selling something they don't have. "They are creating their own currency," Goodman said. "Legitimate shareholders see the price go down and panic." This is the worst kind of manipulation by traders. "In football terms, it is called 'piling on,'" Goodman said. This practice can delist and destroy public companies, and it usually happens to small, new and low-priced companies that do not have widely known reputations. Naked short selling sometimes happens to big companies, too. Martha Stewart Omnivision, Delta Air Lines and Krispy Kreme are recent examples. Short selling occurred on the bad news at those companies, but the naked short sellers made price declines worse. "It's happened to thousands of companies, and it is time it stopped," said Robert Flaherty, editor of Equities magazine in New York, who has long campaigned for short-selling reforms. The naked shorting winners are the traders who can successfully profit by shorting without borrowing shares and the brokerage firms that make commissions. The losers are the victimized public companies and their investors. The damage they suffer is far greater than the gains by the greedy manipulators. Damages are said to be in the hundreds of billions of dollars in past years, if not trillions of dollars. Did I say this is illegal? It's been against the law since the Securities and Exchange Commission was founded in 1933, because it is widely believed that naked short selling contributed to the 1929 stock market crash. The SEC recently took another step to curb the practice. On Jan. 7, the commission implemented Regulation SHO (for "short selling"), which calls for the daily listing of companies where the number of shares being traded does not match the number of legitimate outstanding shares beyond certain percentages. The difference is the shares that have not been delivered for borrowing. Some of those are "naked," or counterfeit shares. Most companies listed are on the NASDAQ small capitalization and over-the-counter bulletin board exchanges, but naked shorting happens also at the New York and American stock exchanges. Sometimes San Antonio-based companies appear on the Regulation SHO list. One such company that recently appeared is Tidelands Oil and Gas Corp., a pipeline company that trades shares on the NASDAQ over-the-counter bulletin board. Barry Gross, an investor relations spokesman for Tidelands, said only that being on the list may or may not indicate naked short selling. The SEC's criteria are meant, however, to alert the investment world that traded share numbers are out of whack. The very existence of this daily list indicates that the illegal practice continues every day. Equities editor Flaherty said some traders run these fake shares through foreign exchanges, especially one in Germany, and through offshore hedge funds to escape the SEC's reach. What angers Flaherty is the way naked short selling kills new public companies trying to bring promising medical products to market.
more...
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Mar 2, 2005 9:43:37 GMT -5
Naked short sellers often claim a company's technologies do not work to justify their short positions, he explained. Flaherty knows of companies offering vital products — including devices to detect mad cow disease and to prevent the spread of disease to rescuers administering mouth-to-mouth resuscitation — that have been victims of naked shorting. Public company chief executives often are frustrated by these rumors when trying to report their companies' earnings and other measures of progress. Should the SEC do more to stop naked short selling? Flaherty said Regulation SHO is a positive step, but the SEC should follow up by contacting the brokerage firms and traders and ordering them to clean up the mess they have caused by producing and trading the shares involved. But Lou Thompson, president of the National Investors Relations Institute, doubts the SEC will take further steps. "We've been after the SEC to require more disclosure of short selling, especially when there have been large volumes of short selling. The SEC just says short selling is legitimate," Thompson said. The courts may be another way investors and public companies can seek protection. Lawsuits have been piling up at a group of Houston law firms. The lawsuits name the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., an electronic clearing exchange owned by the NYSE and NASDAQ, as part of the problem. The lawsuits allege the DTC has a conflict of interest when naked short selling occurs because it charges fees when shares, including counterfeit ones, are traded. These lawsuits may uncover the true dimensions of this problem. San Antonio-based ATSI Communications Inc., an international telecommunications company, is one company represented in the lawsuits. Christian Smith & Jewell in Houston is its law firm. Its lawsuit was filed Oct. 31, 2002. In the meantime, advocates operating anti-naked shorting Internet sites are using the Social Security privatization debate to further their cause. Their point: A stock market that allows manipulations of prices such as naked short selling is not a market where people should invest their Social Security dollars
|
|
|
Post by fastwalker on Mar 2, 2005 9:44:01 GMT -5
New York Post Columnist Calls For Dismantling Of SEC And ‘Self Regulation’ / FinancialWire® <br> March 1, 2005 (FinancialWire) Financial muckraker Christopher Byron, writing in News Corp.’s (NYSE: NWS) NY Post, has called for the dismantling of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, in an article entitled, “SEC’s Empty Quiver.” He said the potential “consent decree” with Martha Stewart, founder of Martha Stewart OmniLiving (NYSE: MSO), who is soon to begin appearing in two shows on General Electric’s (NYSE: GE) after her release from what he calls “Camp Cupcake” shows that the SEC has lost its backbone if not its mission. “Put simply, the securities fraud and insider trading case that the SEC filed in New York federal court against Stewart in June, 2003, which has been on hold since, will stand as enduring proof that clever PR by a rich and well-connected defendant will beat a toothless and weak-kneed SEC civil suit 100% of the time,” Byron stated. He said it again proves that “the 70-year-old system of enforcing the nation's securities laws is broken, unfixable and needs to be junked. “A single, unified regulatory body has to be created and given real and comprehensive enforcement powers, both criminal and civil, replacing the chaotic system of so-called ‘self-regulation’ that we now have, which everybody rightly views as a laughingstock. “The National Association of Securities Dealers does a good job policing the brokerage industry. But its compliance powers are limited, for the most part, to yanking crooked brokers' licenses. Unfortunately, these brokers quickly go back into business as crooked stock promoters, but the SEC, which has jurisdiction in that area, doesn't track these thugs in any systematic way, which is just as well since their power to deter wrongful behavior is all but nonexistent. “In fact, the biggest weapon currently in the SEC arsenal is the threat of hauling an offender into court in a civil suit. “That might have some deterrent value if defendants thought something terrible could wind up happening to them as a result. But the vast majority of these cases wind up being settled before trial by a meaningless bit of nonsense known as a consent decree,” stated Byron. “Generally speaking, defendants view these consent decrees as a joke, especially since the end result is typically a settlement in which the accused gets to avoid admitting doing anything wrong in the first place, just so long as he promises never to do it again. “What's more, the fines that accompany them are trivial, and if a defendant cries poor-mouth loudly enough, the fine will likely get waived,” he charged.
|
|