Is the OS known??

[fastwalker]

:)Is the OS known??

Yes, I believe it is...but it may not be the "target" OS. Let me explain.

If you will remember back in July or August, the TA told us they had completed the audit and the OS was known. And since that date, we have heard from Melvin that the OS is known. But saying that the OS is known may be a "play on words". Meaning...the OS is known "at that time", but that doesn't mean the OS is not changing. I believe that UC/RG have known what the OS is since July/August (even though it is constantly changing) and have been whittling away at it to get it to a target OS...by retiring shares. How do they know when it is at the "target" OS...by keeping track of it daily...therefore, they "do" know the OS...they never said they were at the "final" OS.

One thing that "may" add credibility to this. Our divies ratios are based on the AS...not the OS. Why! Maybe because the OS is constantly changing by the retiring of shares that is ongoing. Therefore, UC/RG based the divies on a set number (only until the OS is at the target number)...the AS.

Just my opinion. FWIW

[azesm]

Exactly my thoughts, Fastwalker!
I think they just have to know the initial O/S. So, they always knew the real (current) O/S. And they always meant certain target O/S.

One thing they don't know is size of NSS. It reminds me of your theory on UCAD divis role as a probe stone. One more proof - is set of two GEMM divis...



(Will try to find your post about that)

[azesm]

Here it is:

newcmkx.proboards33.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1097184307

[hexges]

I think the o/s is known by uc and roger , melvin and few select but I don't thinks its the numbers we are all figuring .. jmo

[fastwalker]

;D Good point Hex...it's all speculation ..some good some bad...some will never fly, but all are subject to the Facts...lol