Post by fastwalker on Oct 21, 2004 16:44:09 GMT -5
;D
Posted by: narvo
In reply to: None Date:10/21/2004 3:34:11 PM
Post #of 19063
Yawl c this??
Good stuff with patience. Sorry if already posted. Narvo
To The Class: Our Reward for the NSS
Posted by coachphilm 10/21/04 @ 11:36am
cmkxdiamond.proboards32.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1098376561
Hello all,
After my talk on the pal-talk site "Dr Diamonds room" I was asked to put my theory on paper so here it is.
Lets first review a few issues. our A/S was at 500 billion and assuming UC owns 51% :
255b= UC
245b=to sell
Then increase of 300 b
151b=UC
147b=to sell
total's 392b retail 408b UC
for a total of 800 billion A/S
If we are shorted "X" the MM's that hold a negative possition in our company must negotiate a settlement with cmkx and ucad.
So when UCAD was announced as our first divy, the SEC and DTC was notified from cmkx thru our T/A that we have a short in our share structure. Then UCAD announces another 3:1 fwd split to complicate the MM's short possition.
Now the MM started purchasing ucad shares on the open market to cover thier short possition on the first divy. After the 2nd divy was announced the MM's then approuched UCAD to make a deal for thier negative possition, but UCAD says no, not until you correct your nss with CMKX. With Rodger Glenn as lead council for both companies is a nice move. Now Rodger can play one against the other. How? Simple
Lets assume that "X" above is 800b nss in cmkx. ( you can put any amount in X as the nss) If Rodger says ok you give cmkx .01 per nss or .05 thats 8billion or 40bil dollars and we will give you the shares you need, BUT you must also buy the ucad shares at 20.00 per share as well. Using the 9 shares per million divy, the amount owed to ucad is 154million on the first divy and 463mil for the 3:1 fwd split. Lets total this before moving forward.
cmkx=8billion or 40b
ucad=617mil
Now the deal is made with the MM's, ucad and cmkx increases the A/S to make all shares legit. Now heres the fun part:
For us as shareholders to win, because under this example the A/S is now 1.6 trillion (800+X) UC takes the money made from the deal with the MM's and issues a cash divy on the CIM company. Why CIM, the first being cim is a private company and has no manipulation by anyone. UC knows the A/S and O/S and we as shareholders have all recieved the same ratio of shares based on our holding in cmkx. So fair it is. We will recieve a much larger divy using cim than cmkx.
Now all the paperwork is ready for the big reporting news. We now have a steady stream on income from the gold mine, we a confirmed share structure, the history is done the financials are done. Now a few days before cmkx becomes reporting we roll out CIM. Why the MM's still have to cover the cim divy and the gemm.
As soon as cim becomes tradable( going public) it should trade like ucad did. Because the mm's need our shares and alot of us will sell at 1-5 dollars per share.
Again we as shareholders win. Now when do we do this manuevor. Iam guessing between the two gemm divy's, which would make sense if you believe UC is going to announce reporting date at the party in Vegas.
You noticed I only used the cmkx and ucad in the "penalty" calculations for the buy in from the MM's nss possition. And yes I think Rodger also negotiated the gemm and a figure for CIM. All the monies put in a kitty for us to recieve a cash divy and to retire shares because of the raise in the A/S.
And yes we can adjust all the numbers above it could be .10 for cmkx or 30.00 for ucad, the above is just an example. Remeber we want to pentalize the MM's not bankrupt them, we need them in the future. But they will be watched from now on by several agencies.
There is alot of good stuff comming our way, hold firm and enjoy the ride. This is all in my oppinion and just another theory to be added to several out there.
Always do your DD
Coach
Posted by: narvo
In reply to: None Date:10/21/2004 3:34:11 PM
Post #of 19063
Yawl c this??
Good stuff with patience. Sorry if already posted. Narvo
To The Class: Our Reward for the NSS
Posted by coachphilm 10/21/04 @ 11:36am
cmkxdiamond.proboards32.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1098376561
Hello all,
After my talk on the pal-talk site "Dr Diamonds room" I was asked to put my theory on paper so here it is.
Lets first review a few issues. our A/S was at 500 billion and assuming UC owns 51% :
255b= UC
245b=to sell
Then increase of 300 b
151b=UC
147b=to sell
total's 392b retail 408b UC
for a total of 800 billion A/S
If we are shorted "X" the MM's that hold a negative possition in our company must negotiate a settlement with cmkx and ucad.
So when UCAD was announced as our first divy, the SEC and DTC was notified from cmkx thru our T/A that we have a short in our share structure. Then UCAD announces another 3:1 fwd split to complicate the MM's short possition.
Now the MM started purchasing ucad shares on the open market to cover thier short possition on the first divy. After the 2nd divy was announced the MM's then approuched UCAD to make a deal for thier negative possition, but UCAD says no, not until you correct your nss with CMKX. With Rodger Glenn as lead council for both companies is a nice move. Now Rodger can play one against the other. How? Simple
Lets assume that "X" above is 800b nss in cmkx. ( you can put any amount in X as the nss) If Rodger says ok you give cmkx .01 per nss or .05 thats 8billion or 40bil dollars and we will give you the shares you need, BUT you must also buy the ucad shares at 20.00 per share as well. Using the 9 shares per million divy, the amount owed to ucad is 154million on the first divy and 463mil for the 3:1 fwd split. Lets total this before moving forward.
cmkx=8billion or 40b
ucad=617mil
Now the deal is made with the MM's, ucad and cmkx increases the A/S to make all shares legit. Now heres the fun part:
For us as shareholders to win, because under this example the A/S is now 1.6 trillion (800+X) UC takes the money made from the deal with the MM's and issues a cash divy on the CIM company. Why CIM, the first being cim is a private company and has no manipulation by anyone. UC knows the A/S and O/S and we as shareholders have all recieved the same ratio of shares based on our holding in cmkx. So fair it is. We will recieve a much larger divy using cim than cmkx.
Now all the paperwork is ready for the big reporting news. We now have a steady stream on income from the gold mine, we a confirmed share structure, the history is done the financials are done. Now a few days before cmkx becomes reporting we roll out CIM. Why the MM's still have to cover the cim divy and the gemm.
As soon as cim becomes tradable( going public) it should trade like ucad did. Because the mm's need our shares and alot of us will sell at 1-5 dollars per share.
Again we as shareholders win. Now when do we do this manuevor. Iam guessing between the two gemm divy's, which would make sense if you believe UC is going to announce reporting date at the party in Vegas.
You noticed I only used the cmkx and ucad in the "penalty" calculations for the buy in from the MM's nss possition. And yes I think Rodger also negotiated the gemm and a figure for CIM. All the monies put in a kitty for us to recieve a cash divy and to retire shares because of the raise in the A/S.
And yes we can adjust all the numbers above it could be .10 for cmkx or 30.00 for ucad, the above is just an example. Remeber we want to pentalize the MM's not bankrupt them, we need them in the future. But they will be watched from now on by several agencies.
There is alot of good stuff comming our way, hold firm and enjoy the ride. This is all in my oppinion and just another theory to be added to several out there.
Always do your DD
Coach
